Brig.Gen. Timothy R. Larsen, Vice Commander of U.S. Armed Forces in Japan,
performed the lecture entitled a "Japan-U.S. security relationship"
to 350 or more persons' general public on 9 Sept. 2003 at the "Toranomon
Dohjo" of the Tokyo Foundation (Chairman, Kimindo Kusaka) in Tokyo
Akasaka. The lecture was supported by JAAGA for a better understanding
of the general public about the status and view of the Japan-U.S. relationship. Gen.
Larsen gave a lecture on about 1 hour and a half (include questions) energetically
about the significance of the presence of the U.S. Forces in this area,
the Iraq issue, the North Korea issue, etc., weaving an intrepid expression
as a Marine Corps and the softness of the manner which mainly cultivated
Okinawa by four employment in Japan. Although he just arrived at the post
from the U.S.M.C. base commander in Okinawa . It is the summary below.
About the scale of U.S. presence, it is the 58,000 military personnel,
the 5000 U.S. civilian employee, the 25,000 contractors, and the 52,000
families, and amounts to a total of 140,000 people now. This presence
does not have complications, either, contributes to the stability of this
area, and the stability in the world, and will also continue tackling a
future subject with an uncertain terrorism issue etc. until it continues
in a past half century and results from the 60s with an eye on the opposite
Soviet Union in a move of the latest opposite North Korea. About the Iraq
issue, the prompt support of Japan for Allied Forces proves the place where
dependability has Japan, and the U.S. appreciates very much. I believe
what Japan voted the rightness of Iraq War of releasing Iraq people from
a coercion person, and supported it. Furthermore, the fact that Japan
also promised financial support is welcomed collectively. Serious works
serious remains in Iraq now on. I do not hear that the U.S. expects something
from Japan, and Japan judges and wants to act based on a national interest
of Japan. We'll also expect the specialized agency of United Nations,
and assistance of NGO from now on. An affiliation of the both sides of
a military man and a civilian is required for reconstruction after the
war. Because the six-nation council has just finished about North Korea
issue and it is the midst of diplomatic work now, so I cannot make reference
about a military option. We military is supporting diplomatic work 100%. The
nuclear in North Korea is a very serious threat. United States has preparation
of different assistance from the former and preparation of new related
establishment, if North Korea abandons the nuclear by an irreversible means.
After his lecture, the following
questions there were.
・Should Japan obtain the nuclear armament?
・Does the United States wish the amendment of Article 9 of Japanese
Constitution?
・When the 2nd Division of U.S.Army deployed in South Korea pulls back,
is there
any option which comes to Japan?
・When the nonaggression pact with North Korea are concluded, what kind of
reaction comes out?
・Possibility of decentralization of U.S. Forces centralizedly deployed
in Okinawa
to Japanese mainland?
・Future of military cooperation with Japan and the United
States?
When considering a future Japan-U.S. security relationship, He personally
thinks that the world has changed in this 2 years. They are the date of
dramatic diversification, the date which cannot be predicted, and the date
of the threat which cannot be predicted newly today. Therefore, it said
that he thinks that it must evolve into the supple Japan-U.S. alliance
relationship which can respond to all areas, and the lecture was rounded
off from now on. (Reported by secretariat Nakatsukasa)

Lecture by Gen. Larsen at Toranomon-Dohjo